Any full-blooded Americans around here?

I didn’t think so.

Read it and weep

By the way, didn’t we eradicate the full-blooded ‘Americans’ we met when we got here…?

…oh, and F@ck You, Kathleen Parker.

Advertisements
Published in: on May 15, 2008 at 10:03 pm  Comments (1)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://donkeyod.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/any-full-blooded-americans-around-here/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

One CommentLeave a comment

  1. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/03/opinion/03fri2.html?ref=housing_plan

    New York Times Editorial
    Housing on the BrinkPublished: September 2, 2010

    There was a glimmer of hope in housing data this week. Pending sales — signed contracts between buyers and sellers — rose in July, by 5.2 percent, beating expectations of a modest decline. Sales are still down by 19 percent compared with a year ago. But any sign of activity was a welcome relief because most potential buyers have been sidelined by an array of economic ills: unemployment, job insecurity, fear of further price declines or the inability to get a loan.

    If only the uptick was sustainable. Willing buyers today are responding to low mortgage rates — recently 4.3 percent for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage — and to prices they find fair. By one standard price measure, which compares the cost of renting and owning, homes are as affordable now as they were before the housing bubble. Other measures that compare home prices to household incomes show housing at its most affordable in decades. Together with seller concessions, those dynamics are driving the deals that get done in today’s tough market.

    The problem is that reluctant buyers obviously outnumber willing ones, and, in the meantime, swelling inventories from foreclosures presage further price declines. Despite occasional signs of movement, that means general paralysis in the housing market and, coupled with high unemployment, a slowing economy.

    Antiforeclosure efforts, done right, are supposed to prevent that downward spiral, but the Obama administration’s efforts to date have been largely unsuccessful, with lenders reluctant to restructure bad loans and officials unable or unwilling to get them to do more. A new round of federal efforts will begin this month, aimed specifically at helping unemployed homeowners and at encouraging principal reductions on loans where borrowers owe more than their homes are worth. That’s better focused but will work only if lenders cooperate.

    Meanwhile, the administration should investigate ways to facilitate more refinancing. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-controlled mortgage companies, hold millions of mortgages from borrowers who are current on their payments but are unable to refinance because their home equity or credit scores have declined since they first took out their mortgages. Since Fannie and Freddie are at risk if those borrowers default, it makes sense for them to allow the borrowers to refinance to a lower rate, reducing both their payments and the risk that they will be unable to pay.

    A bolstered refinancing effort would have to be monitored to ensure that potential risks to Fannie and Freddie are offset by potential gains to homeowners and the economy. One thing is sure. More needs to be done to prevent further weakening in a wavering market.

    Interesting article, but says what I have mentioned earlier. The administration is allowing the banks to run away with the money it gave them to reduce the foreclosure problem. And the Comptroller of the Currency is composed of mediocre or outright incompetent personnel who find it easier to just side with the banks. So the mortgagees have no recourse at all but to wait and get a high paying job in an nonexistent economy or file lawsuits — which, of course, would have to include the government itself which is what the banks are using to defend their destructive strategy.

    I don’t know if hiring Paul Krugman — as some people have suggested — to to the job that Geithner is now NOT doing would have solved the problem. But it’s all speculation. Geithner, I know at least, is totally on the side of the unconditionally bailed out banks. Obama refuses to let his vulture go. And the rest of us scrimp and save and not spend and pray in hopes for a better situation or for jobs at least. The banks are lending only to people whose credit scores they have not destroyed and who have high-paying jobs. This is “change you can believe in?” Oh, and the banks will only reduce your mortgage interest rate if you don’t really need said reduction.

    “This is an awful mess you’ve gotten us into” — to quote from Laurel and Hardy.

    Migdia Chinea UCLA MFA TFTDM Screewriter and Digital Media


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: